LITR 5737 Literary & Historical Utopias

 

 

 

Monday, 10 June: Herland

 

 

Monday, 11 June: conclude Herland

Historical presentation: Jo Lynn Sallee: Twin Oaks

Discussion-starter: Brouke M. Rose-Carpenter

Web review: Ayn Rand sites on course webpage: Donny Wankan

 

Tuesday, 12 June: Anthem

Historical presentation: Brouke M. Rose-Carpenter (feminist utopias)

Discussion-starter: Tish Wallace

 

Thursday, 14 June: Anthem

Historical presentation: Amy Braselton: Islamic utopias or utopias gone too far

Roundtable discussion on midterms

 

Monday, 18 June: midterm

 

Tuesday, 19 June: selections from Genesis & Revelation; the Book of Acts; Plato’s Republic; American founding documents

Historical presentation: Heaven as utopia?—Cindy Goodson

Preview of Dr. King’s Dream Speech: Liz Davis

Historical presentation +- Web review: Kibbutzim of Israel: Gordon Lewis


Monday, 11 June: conclude Herland

Discussion-starter: Brouke M. Rose-Carpenter

 

Herland

“Ma-land”-Terry

Part 2

By: Brouke M. Rose-Carpenter

 

Herland is a utopian novel from 1915, written by feminist Charlotte Perkins Gilman. The book describes an isolated society comprised entirely of Aryan women who reproduce via parthenogenesis (asexual reproduction). The result is an ideal social order, free of war, conflict and domination.  (same opening as Fran, brought to us by Wikapedia!)

 

Which brings us to the first question…

 

*Is this utopian society “ideal”?

           

            Or even better…

Following objective 3a.To investigate historical, nonfiction attempts by “communes,” “intentional communities,” or even nations to put utopian ideals into practice. Admittedly, all utopian communities eventually fail (or at least submerge), but how to get beyond “They don’t work” as a discussion-stopper? (For instance, even if all utopias fail, that doesn’t stop people from imagining or attempting utopias.)

So, did the Herland society fail?

 

What elements of a society do we judge to determine if it is ideal, or a failure? 

Allow me to narrow this spectrum with an overflow into objective 4a. What academic subjects or disciplines are involved with utopian studies? Examples: literature, history, sociology, economics, architecture, urban planning?

Education is vital to the acceptance of any society.  I do understand that an education is not the only key element, but for Herlanders, can education be considered a summary of their society?

For instance, the phrase, “Knowledge is power” is not directly employed in Herland in the regards to the women seeking a powerful position, but they use their knowledge, and hunger for knowledge, to pull their selves out of “Millennialism” 

 

*Do you consider there to be two instances of “Millennial” events?

1.      Volcano-- rebuilding a society-- the immaculate conception—parthenogenesis

2.      Men arrive-- learn of outer world—Jeff/Celis “New Motherhood”

Which brings us to the question…

2d. How essential is “Millennialism” (apocalyptic or end-time narrative) to the utopian narrative?

Some Brouke input: I believe that “Millennialism” (if it occurs twice) is the beginning, and perhaps the end, or broadening, of their utopia.

 

*1b. What different genres contribute to, interface with, or branch from utopia? Examples: dystopia, ecotopia, Socratic dialogue, tract, propaganda, satire, science fiction, fantasy, novel / romance, adventure / travel narrative. Others?

“Okay where are you going Brouke?”  Well I am curious if you saw more “novel” aspects?

Personally, I felt like this was very much a romance and an adventure?  How about you?

Romance: The three couples, with the conflict of being in a new land, conquering multiple obstacles, inevitably facing the conflict of Terry, and who was staying and leaving.  Among many, many more!

Adventure: Okay, the whole book!

Let’s get inside of Perkin’s head, shall we…

Does Perkin’s make/want her readers to reflect on other issues in our own society? 

I believe YES!  I love the way that the Herlander’s innocent questions provoke BIG questions and answers for the characters, and readers!

Ie: Van’s comparative reflections on Herland’s ideals vs. the rest of the world.

ONE last note and I’ll leave you alone…

p. 98-99 Goes back to the question of “No Conflict”  

 

 

 

 

 


assignments for Anthem

 

read introduction to Anthem, esp. questions of genre on pp. vii-viii

read through p. 77 (through ch. VII) at least

 

Tuesday:

complete Anthem (through ch. XII, p. 105)

 

Discussion of Anthem:

compare / contrast to utopian texts

What do the utopias scant or blur that Rand develops?

dystopia or counter-utopia?

Resemblance to other dystopias or satirical utopias like Brave New World, Nineteen Eight-Four, Animal Farm, Lord of the Flies

Dystopia as "inversion" of utopia? (i. e., does dystopia simply turn utopia on its head, or inside out?)

 

Conclusion to Anthem: does it expose the upsides of utopia?

 



Comparison of some consistent utopian themes with "status quo" of capitalism, nationalism, etc.

 

 

status quo of capitalism, nationalism

utopianism

economic unit capital, property, W's "ownership society" labor, "human capital"
social relations competition cooperation
goal relative to production more people, production, profits, gold, etc. enough people, production, etc., so that other higher goals can be pursued
attitude toward family / community private property > private family; my baby no private property > nation as family
     
gender patriarchy matriarchy
environmental issues conversion of nature to capital eco-feminism? (nature to nurture?)

 

Looking Backward

ch. 18, paragraph 3, Dr. Leete: " . . . the labor we have to render as our part in securing for the nation the means of a comfortable physical existence is by no means regarded as the most important, . .  . interesting, or . . . dignified employment of our power. We look upon it as a necessary duty to be discharged before we can fully devote ourselves to the higher exercise of our faculties, the intellectual and spiritual enjoyments and pursuits which alone mean life." 

cf. Max Weber ("father of sociology"): presumption that as modern culture progressed to meet basic needs of life, people would have more leisure for self-culture, e. g., learning to play musical instruments, recreation, etc.

what happened instead: work longer with less leisure in order to buy things formerly didn't need.

 

Herland

61 grew together, not by competition, but by united action

68 since the prosperity of their children depended on it, the fullest and subtlest coordination began to be practiced

68 women are the natural cooperators, not men

69 Mothers: helpless involuntary fecundity > Conscious Makers of People

70 mother = own pink fascinating bundle of babyhood

76 “But as to everyone knowing which child belongs to which mother—why should she?”

77 finished product is not a private one [private property, private family]

 89 extremely high sense of solidarity

95 no exact analogue for our word home, any more then they had for our Roman-based family . . . devotion to their country and people for which our word patriotism is no definition at all . . .neglect of national interests . . . largely pride . .

97 when we began to talk about each couple having “homes” of our own, they could not understand it. . . . “A man wants a home of his own, with his wife and family in it.”

124-5 personal privacy, possession

 

Literary issues:

Stylistically, Herland is a tour de force [a feat of skill, ingenious accomplishment]. Compared to most other utopian novels, the novel's style is surprisingly brisk and energetic.

Written in 1915-16, Gilman's style appears to imitate that of various male swashbuckling adventure novelists of the time such as Edgar Rice Burroughs (Tarzan and John Carter, Warlord of Mars series, both begun 1912); Anthony Hope (Prisoner of Zenda 1894), H. Rider Haggard (She 1886, King Solomon's Mines 1885)

Told through male point-of-view

Three distinct male characters visit an "Amazonian" hidden valley (cf. Shangri-La)

Highest interest of novel may be Gilman's depiction of male psychology in reaction to women in power.

But . . . 

Some problems with women's characterization

Problem of sameness in utopian community?

At what points do women characters achieve most literary impact?

 

83 disproportionate egotism > sure she had the right to have children, even that hers would be better than others

90-1 I liked her that day she balanced . . . I thought of her most

91 a sense of understanding, identity, purpose

100 Life is a struggle, has to be

100 The drama of the country was—to our taste—rather flat . . lacked the sex motives and, with it, jealousy

100 impressive array of pageantry, processions, grand ritual, with arts and religion broadly blended

126 “we” x-personal

126-7 sweet intense joy of married lovers > higher creative work . . . doing this in season and out of season with no thought of children at all?

127 bowed my hot head on her shoulder

 140 “adventures by sea and land,” as you say

 

 

 

 

Herland maintains most of these divisions, but instead of concentrating on property-labor as essential or determining division in society, it concentrates on gender.

eco-feminism is a hybrid word of "ecological feminism"

eco-feminism definition

"environmental feminism"

(One reason this subject is brought up here is that much of Herland anticipates our last course text, Ecotopia.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Leftover notes from previous classes

 

"Millennialism" in both Looking Backward & Herland

2c. How does the introduction of “millennialism” (end-time or apocalyptic narrative) transform the plot of the utopian narrative?

Herland creation story depends on violent apocalyptic narrative

Looking Backward depends on an alternative "post-millennial" millennialism that is a tradition in liberal American Christianity--less about Judgment Day, more about establishment or fulfillment of Kingdom of God on Earth, America as "New Jerusalem" (Brook Farm, the Transcendentalist Utopia, started with similar theories by Unitarian ministers.)

 

 

 

Daniel's links

On page 58 of Herland, we learn that they worship the goddess Maaia. Below is a great web page I found on the nature of Maia, plus her role as the three faces of woman-virgin, mother, crone-similar to the role of the original parthenogenic woman-Queen, Priestess, Mother (59).

http://www.menlo.com/folks/davis/Maya_Web/Maya_Name.html

 

This is a really interesting site that incorporates both koinonia and utopianism.

http://koinoniapartners.org/

This site gives a good discussion of the meaning of koinonia.

http://www.gracenotes.info/topics/fellowship.html

 

I found this site while looking for annus mundi. It’s interesting look at apocalyptic millennialism.

http://www.mille.org/people/rlpages/cchart.html

http://www.mille.org/welcome/glossary.html

http://www.plexoft.com/SBF/A07.html